Top 10 in Supplier Network
Awarded for placing #6 out of 29 companies in Supplier Network. Current value: 21.
Company Profile
Easy Terra
Ratings, trust signals, and market context in one profile
This company currently shows risk signals that can limit growth if not addressed in the next cycles.
Easy Terra is ranked #22 and sits at the 40th percentile in the current market snapshot.
Current traffic is 277K, with month-over-month momentum at -17.1%.
Reliability Index is 28.3, while aggregated rating is 3.38.
Operational coverage includes 21 suppliers and 12 languages.
Reliability Index
28.3
Reliability vs market: -3.5
Market Rank
#22
Percentile
40%
Review volume
10K
2/4 review sources
Rating
3.38/5
Trustpilot
Data freshness
September 2026
Last updated: September 2026
Outlook:
Signals point to pressure; recovery should focus on core trust and demand metrics first.
Awards & embed
Awards and achivments
Current ranking awards and milestone badges based on customer reviews, review volume, supplier network, language coverage, popularity, and Reliability Index.
Current awards: 4
Milestone: 250K+ Popularity
Awarded for clearing the 250K+ milestone in Popularity. Current value: 277K.
Milestone: 10K+ Review Volume
Awarded for clearing the 10K+ milestone in Review Volume. Current value: 10K.
Milestone: 10+ Language Coverage
Awarded for clearing the 10+ milestone in Language Coverage. Current value: 12.
About Easy Terra
Primary domain
easyterra.atData confidence
Confidence score: 67
Medium confidence
Suppliers
21
Languages
12
Active domains
easyterra.at, easyterra.be, easyterra.ch, easyterra.co.uk, easyterra.com, easyterra.de, easyterra.dk, easyterra.es, easyterra.fr, easyterra.it, easyterra.nl, easyterra.no, easyterra.pl, easyterra.pt, easyterra.se
Data freshness
Reviews updatedSeptember 2026
Traffic updatedSeptember 2026
Ranking updatedSeptember 2026
Attributes updatedSeptember 2026
Signal narrative
A plain-language read of strengths, risks, and what deserves attention next.
Current strengths
Stable baseline
No single standout advantage right now, but the profile remains stable enough to build from.
Current risks
Trust gap
Reliability is currently -3.5 versus market average.
Demand softening
Recent traffic momentum is -17.1%, indicating weaker pull.
Coverage gap
Coverage is below market on suppliers (+5) or languages (0).
Review intelligence
Review footprint and archive trend
Current cross-platform snapshot, industry context, and a Trustpilot time series built from Wayback snapshots plus the latest available Trustpilot month.
Rating
3.38
Review volume
10K
Review spread
0.49
Dominant source
Trustpilot
Current review platform mix
Bars show each platform's share of current review volume, so you can see where the rating story is concentrated.
2 review sources
8,665 reviews · 85%
1,532 reviews · 15%
Reviews.io—
—
Review Centre—
—
Industry position
Compare current aggregated rating and review volume against the market average.
Rating
Gap vs market: -0.42
Company3.38
Market average3.80
Review volume
Gap vs market: -82%
Company10K
Market average56K
Company percentile
26%
Review volume percentile
40%
Trustpilot archive trend
Wayback snapshots aggregated across all company domains, with estimated monthly points between captures and the latest current Trustpilot month merged in when available.
ObservedEstimated
Observed coverage
6 / 69
9%
Data points
6Observed
63 Estimated
Latest observed month
March 2026
July 2020 - March 2026
Trustpilot rating over time
July 2020 - March 2026
3.50
Trustpilot review count over time
July 2020 - March 2026
8K
Method
Historical Trustpilot data comes from Wayback Machine snapshots of public review pages. We first estimate each domain separately, then aggregate them at company level and merge the latest current Trustpilot month when available. Gaps remain estimated because many dates were never archived.
Snapshot note
The platform counts above use the live cross-platform review dataset. The Trustpilot series below combines Wayback archive points with the latest available Trustpilot snapshot, so the ending point can still differ from the current cross-platform snapshot.
Executive summary
What this profile says
This company currently shows risk signals that can limit growth if not addressed in the next cycles.
Easy Terra is ranked #22 and sits at the 40th percentile in the current market snapshot.
Current traffic is 277K, with month-over-month momentum at -17.1%.
Reliability Index is 28.3, while aggregated rating is 3.38.
Operational coverage includes 21 suppliers and 12 languages.
CompanyMarket average+-
Metric
Company
Gap vs market
Market average
Reliability Index
28.3
-11%
31.7
Rating
3.38
-11%
3.80
Traffic
277K
-53%
589K
Suppliers
21
+28%
16.38
Languages
12
-3%
12.37
Outlook: Signals point to pressure; recovery should focus on core trust and demand metrics first.
Reliability Index breakdown
Current formula
20% Traffic + 20% Reviews + 20% Suppliers + 20% Languages + 20% Media Mentions
Normalized
Contribution
| Component | Weight | Normalized | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic | 20% | 0.082 | 1.64 |
| Rating | 20% | 0.573 | 11.46 |
| Suppliers | 20% | 0.400 | 8.00 |
| Languages | 20% | 0.293 | 5.85 |
| Media Mentions | 20% | 0.065 | 1.31 |
| Reliability Index | 100% | — | 28.26 |
Company facts
review sources
Data freshness
Reviews updatedSeptember 2026
Traffic updatedSeptember 2026
Ranking updatedSeptember 2026
Attributes updatedSeptember 2026
How this company compares
The company is at or above market on 1 out of 5 core benchmark metrics.
Reliability Index
Gap vs market: -3.5Company28.3
Market average31.7
Company percentile40%
Rating
Gap vs market: -0.42Company3.38
Market average3.80
Company percentile26%
Traffic
Gap vs market: -53%Company277K
Market average589K
Company percentile54%
Suppliers
Gap vs market: +5Company21
Market average16.38
Company percentile83%
Languages
Gap vs market: 0Company12
Market average12.37
Company percentile60%
Can you trust this profile?
Use freshness, review-source coverage, and history depth to decide how much weight to give the current score.
Data confidence
Confidence score: 67
Medium confidence
Data freshness
September 2026
Last updated: September 2026
review sources
2/4
Trustpilot · Google Reviews
History (traffic/reviews/reliability months)
11/3/5
Traffic / Rating / Reliability Index
What to double-check
Traffic
Gap vs market: -53%
Company: 277K · Market average: 589K
Rating
Gap vs market: -11.1%
Company: 3.38 · Market average: 3.80
Reliability Index
Gap vs market: -10.9%
Company: 28.3 · Market average: 31.7
Similar companies cohort
Nearest peers by scale and profile signals.
Zuzuche
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
20.9
Rating
3.70
Traffic228K
Suppliers—
Languages1
Enjoy Travel
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
32.3
Rating
4.35
Traffic256K
Suppliers16
Languages18
Car Rental 8
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
26.7
Rating
2.60
Traffic231K
Suppliers15
Languages3
Yolcu 360
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
29.8
Rating
4.35
Traffic486K
Suppliers15
Languages14
Cohort average
Reliability Index
29.1
Rating
3.91
Traffic
332K
Suppliers
16.75
Languages
9.8
Change timeline
Traffic change (first vs latest)
+169,402
Rating change (first vs latest)
-0.14
Reliability change (first vs latest)
+1.35
Timeline cards use the first and latest available month per metric.
Historical trends
Reliability Index trend
February 2026
26.9
February 2026
36.1
March 2026
36.2
March 2026
27.1
September 2026
28.3
Aggregated rating trend
February 2026
3.52 · 10K
March 2026
3.54 · 10K
September 2026
3.38 · 10K
Traffic trend
Current month
277K
Previous month
334K
Month-over-month
-17.1%
What this means
Traffic changed by +169,402 between the first and latest available month.
Aggregated rating changed by -0.14 between the first and latest observed month.
Reliability changed by +1.35 over the currently available history window.
Methodology and interpretation guide
How to read this profile, where data comes from, and what constraints to keep in mind.
This profile combines ratings, traffic, suppliers, and language coverage into a consistent comparative frame. The goal is directional clarity, not perfect prediction.
Interpret trends as movement signals over available history windows. Short history can still be useful, but confidence is lower and should be treated carefully.
Known limitations: Some metrics refresh on different cadences, and platform coverage can vary by company. Always pair this view with business context before making high-impact decisions.
Quick FAQ
Why can a company have strong rating but weaker reliability?
Reliability combines multiple signals. A strong rating can be offset by weaker traffic, coverage, or limited data depth.
Why can ratings differ across review platforms?
Each platform has a different customer mix and review volume. Check both the aggregated score and the spread between sources before drawing conclusions.
What should I check first on this page?
Start with the rating, review volume, spread between review sources, latest update month, and the strengths and risks summary. Together they give the fastest trust read.