Top 5 in Supplier Network
Awarded for placing #4 out of 29 companies in Supplier Network. Current value: 23.
Company Profile
QEEQ
Ratings, trust signals, and market context in one profile
This company has a balanced profile with room to improve one or two key signals for stronger market position.
QEEQ is ranked #12 and sits at the 69th percentile in the current market snapshot.
Current traffic is 399K, with month-over-month momentum at +3.9%.
Reliability Index is 35.2, while aggregated rating is 4.40.
Operational coverage includes 23 suppliers and 12 languages.
Reliability Index
35.2
Reliability vs market: +3.7
Market Rank
#12
Percentile
69%
Review volume
17K
2/4 review sources
Rating
4.40/5
Trustpilot
Data freshness
March 2026
Last updated: March 2026
Outlook:
Signals point to healthy momentum; the priority is to protect consistency while scaling.
Awards & embed
Awards and achivments
Current ranking awards and milestone badges based on customer reviews, review volume, supplier network, language coverage, popularity, and Reliability Index.
Current awards: 5
Milestone: 250K+ Popularity
Awarded for clearing the 250K+ milestone in Popularity. Current value: 399K.
Milestone: 4.0+ Customer Reviews
Awarded for clearing the 4.0+ milestone in Customer Reviews. Current value: 4.4.
Milestone: 10K+ Review Volume
Awarded for clearing the 10K+ milestone in Review Volume. Current value: 17K.
Milestone: 10+ Language Coverage
Awarded for clearing the 10+ milestone in Language Coverage. Current value: 12.
About QEEQ
QEEQ is a relatively newer car rental comparison platform that has grown quickly in the market. The company offers bookings across a broad range of global destinations, partnering with both major brands and local suppliers. QEEQ supports multiple languages and has positioned itself as a technology-driven platform with a mobile-first approach. The company has received generally positive customer reviews and continues to expand its supplier network.
Active domains
qeeq.com
Data freshness
Reviews updatedMarch 2026
Traffic updatedMarch 2026
Ranking updatedMarch 2026
Attributes updatedMarch 2026
Signal narrative
A plain-language read of strengths, risks, and what deserves attention next.
Current strengths
Trust advantage
Reliability sits +3.7 versus market average.
Demand momentum
Latest traffic momentum is +3.9% month over month.
Current risks
Coverage gap
Coverage is below market on suppliers (+7) or languages (0).
Review intelligence
Review footprint and archive trend
Current cross-platform snapshot, industry context, and a Trustpilot time series built from Wayback snapshots plus the latest available Trustpilot month.
Rating
4.40
Review volume
17K
Review spread
3.40
Dominant source
Trustpilot
Current review platform mix
Bars show each platform's share of current review volume, so you can see where the rating story is concentrated.
2 review sources
16,735 reviews · 100%
1 reviews · 0%
Reviews.io—
—
Review Centre—
—
Industry position
Compare current aggregated rating and review volume against the market average.
Rating
Gap vs market: +0.49
Company4.40
Market average3.91
Review volume
Gap vs market: -67%
Company17K
Market average51K
Company percentile
69%
Review volume percentile
57%
Trustpilot archive trend
Wayback snapshots aggregated across all company domains, with estimated monthly points between captures and the latest current Trustpilot month merged in when available.
ObservedEstimated
Observed coverage
15 / 73
21%
Data points
15Observed
58 Estimated
Latest observed month
March 2026
March 2020 - March 2026
Trustpilot rating over time
March 2020 - March 2026
4.40
Trustpilot review count over time
March 2020 - March 2026
17K
Method
Historical Trustpilot data comes from Wayback Machine snapshots of public review pages. We first estimate each domain separately, then aggregate them at company level and merge the latest current Trustpilot month when available. Gaps remain estimated because many dates were never archived.
Snapshot note
The platform counts above use the live cross-platform review dataset. The Trustpilot series below combines Wayback archive points with the latest available Trustpilot snapshot, so the ending point can still differ from the current cross-platform snapshot.
Executive summary
What this profile says
This company has a balanced profile with room to improve one or two key signals for stronger market position.
QEEQ is ranked #12 and sits at the 69th percentile in the current market snapshot.
Current traffic is 399K, with month-over-month momentum at +3.9%.
Reliability Index is 35.2, while aggregated rating is 4.40.
Operational coverage includes 23 suppliers and 12 languages.
CompanyMarket average+-
Metric
Company
Gap vs market
Market average
Reliability Index
35.2
+12%
31.4
Rating
4.40
+13%
3.91
Traffic
399K
-38%
639K
Suppliers
23
+40%
16.38
Languages
12
-3%
12.37
Outlook: Signals point to healthy momentum; the priority is to protect consistency while scaling.
Reliability Index breakdown
Current formula
25% Traffic + 25% Reviews + 25% Suppliers + 25% Languages
Normalized
Contribution
| Component | Weight | Normalized | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic | 25% | 0.113 | 2.83 |
| Rating | 25% | 0.859 | 21.47 |
| Suppliers | 25% | 0.767 | 19.17 |
| Languages | 25% | 0.293 | 7.32 |
| Reliability Index | 100% | — | 50.78 |
Company facts
review sources
Data freshness
Reviews updatedMarch 2026
Traffic updatedMarch 2026
Ranking updatedMarch 2026
Attributes updatedMarch 2026
How this company compares
The company is at or above market on 3 out of 5 core benchmark metrics.
Reliability Index
Gap vs market: +3.7Company35.2
Market average31.4
Company percentile69%
Rating
Gap vs market: +0.49Company4.40
Market average3.91
Company percentile69%
Traffic
Gap vs market: -37.5%Company399K
Market average639K
Company percentile60%
Suppliers
Gap vs market: +7Company23
Market average16.38
Company percentile90%
Languages
Gap vs market: 0Company12
Market average12.37
Company percentile60%
Can you trust this profile?
Use freshness, review-source coverage, and history depth to decide how much weight to give the current score.
Data confidence
Confidence score: 57
Medium confidence
Data freshness
March 2026
Last updated: March 2026
review sources
2/4
Trustpilot · Google Reviews
History (traffic/reviews/reliability months)
5/2/4
Traffic / Rating / Reliability Index
What to double-check
Traffic
Gap vs market: -37.5%
Company: 399K · Market average: 639K
Languages
Gap vs market: -3%
Company: 12 · Market average: 12.37
Reliability Index
Gap vs market: +11.9%
Company: 35.2 · Market average: 31.4
Similar companies cohort
Nearest peers by scale and profile signals.
Yolcu 360
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
29.7
Rating
4.47
Traffic432K
Suppliers15
Languages14
VIP Cars
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
36.3
Rating
4.63
Traffic497K
Suppliers21
Languages13
Enjoy Travel
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
30.0
Rating
4.05
Traffic350K
Suppliers16
Languages18
Car Flexi
View profileSuggested competitors
Reliability Index
45.4
Rating
4.30
Traffic361K
Suppliers20
Languages24
Cohort average
Reliability Index
35.4
Rating
4.35
Traffic
420K
Suppliers
18
Languages
18.4
Change timeline
Traffic change (first vs latest)
+51,024
Rating change (first vs latest)
0.00
Reliability change (first vs latest)
+7.00
Timeline cards use the first and latest available month per metric.
Historical trends
Reliability Index trend
February 2026
35.3
February 2026
42.3
March 2026
35.2
March 2026
42.3
Aggregated rating trend
February 2026
4.40 · 16K
March 2026
4.40 · 17K
Traffic trend
Current month
399K
Previous month
384K
Month-over-month
+3.9%
What this means
Traffic changed by +51,024 between the first and latest available month.
Aggregated rating changed by 0.00 between the first and latest observed month.
Reliability changed by +7.00 over the currently available history window.
Methodology and interpretation guide
How to read this profile, where data comes from, and what constraints to keep in mind.
This profile combines ratings, traffic, suppliers, and language coverage into a consistent comparative frame. The goal is directional clarity, not perfect prediction.
Interpret trends as movement signals over available history windows. Short history can still be useful, but confidence is lower and should be treated carefully.
Known limitations: Some metrics refresh on different cadences, and platform coverage can vary by company. Always pair this view with business context before making high-impact decisions.
Quick FAQ
Why can a company have strong rating but weaker reliability?
Reliability combines multiple signals. A strong rating can be offset by weaker traffic, coverage, or limited data depth.
Why can ratings differ across review platforms?
Each platform has a different customer mix and review volume. Check both the aggregated score and the spread between sources before drawing conclusions.
What should I check first on this page?
Start with the rating, review volume, spread between review sources, latest update month, and the strengths and risks summary. Together they give the fastest trust read.